Last reviewed:
DS-160 Security and Background Questions
The last section of the DS-160 is a run of yes/no questions about health, crime, security, immigration history and related matters. They cause more anxiety than the rest of the form combined, and most of that anxiety comes from not knowing what they are for.
They are not a personality test. Each group of questions maps to a specific statutory ground of inadmissibility in section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §1182(a)). The officer is not asking whether you seem trustworthy; they are asking whether a particular provision of the statute applies to you.
This page explains what the questions are for. It is not legal advice. If you have anything real in your history — an arrest, a removal, a prior refusal, a visa overstay — talk to an immigration lawyer before you file. The stakes described below are why.
What each group of questions is actually asking
| Question group | Statutory ground |
|---|---|
| Communicable disease, harmful behaviour disorder, drug abuse or addiction | §212(a)(1) — health-related grounds |
| Arrests, convictions, controlled substances, prostitution, money laundering | §212(a)(2) — criminal and related grounds |
| Espionage, sabotage, terrorist activity, genocide, torture, recruitment of child soldiers | §212(a)(3) — security and related grounds |
| Fraud or misrepresentation to obtain a visa or other immigration benefit | §212(a)(6)(C) — misrepresentation |
| Prior removal, deportation, or unlawful presence in the United States | §212(a)(9) — aliens previously removed |
Reading the questions this way makes them far less mysterious. The wording is broad because the statute is broad — "have you ever" questions are drafted to capture the statutory category, not to trap you.
A "yes" is not an automatic refusal
This is the most common misunderstanding, and it matters because it is what drives people to answer dishonestly.
A "yes" means the officer must assess whether the corresponding ground actually applies, and if it does, whether a waiver is available. For nonimmigrant applicants — which is everyone filing a DS-160 — the relevant provision is §212(d)(3)(A), which lets a consular officer recommend that an applicant be admitted temporarily despite being inadmissible, subject to approval. The statute frames it as a discretionary recommendation from the consular officer or the Secretary of State, approved by the Attorney General.
Two limits worth knowing:
- It is discretionary. Nobody is entitled to it, and it is not something you apply for on the DS-160 itself. The officer raises it.
- It does not reach every ground. §212(d)(3)(A) expressly excludes several of the security paragraphs — §212(a)(3)(A)(i)(I), (3)(A)(ii), (3)(A)(iii), (3)(C), and clauses (i) and (ii) of (3)(E). Those are the espionage, sabotage, terrorist-activity, foreign-policy and Nazi-persecution/genocide provisions.
So for the great majority of what these questions ask about — including most criminal grounds — a "yes" opens a discretionary route rather than closing the door.
Why answering dishonestly is the worse risk
Misrepresentation is itself a ground of inadmissibility. §212(a)(6)(C)(i) reads:
Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this chapter is inadmissible.
Two words carry the weight. The misrepresentation must be willful, and the fact must be material — meaning it would have mattered to the decision. An honest mistake on a date is not the same thing as concealing an arrest.
The asymmetry is the point: the underlying issue you were tempted to hide is often waivable under §212(d)(3), while a finding that you lied about it attaches a separate ground that follows you. Concealing a waivable problem can create an unwaivable one.
A caution about advice you may read elsewhere: the widely-cited waiver at §212(i) — the one requiring a U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse or parent and "extreme hardship" — applies by its own terms to immigrants. DS-160 applicants are nonimmigrants, and §212(d)(3) is the provision that fits them. Sources that quote §212(i) at a nonimmigrant audience are quoting the wrong waiver.
Frequently asked questions
Does a "yes" answer mean my visa will be refused?
No. It means the officer assesses whether the statutory ground actually applies and, if it does, whether §212(d)(3)(A) relief is appropriate. That provision exists specifically so that nonimmigrants who are technically inadmissible can still be admitted temporarily at the officer's discretion.
Are the security questions the same as the "security question" on my application?
No, and the two are constantly confused. The security question is the personal reminder you choose when you start the form, used together with your Application ID to reopen it — see retrieving your DS-160. The security and background section is the yes/no questions described on this page.
What does "material" mean in the misrepresentation ground?
The statute requires both a willful misrepresentation and a material fact — one that would have mattered to the decision. This is a legal test applied to your specific facts, which is exactly why a real history is a question for a lawyer rather than a form guide.
Is there any ground that cannot be waived for a nonimmigrant?
Yes. §212(d)(3)(A) excludes §212(a)(3)(A)(i)(I), (3)(A)(ii), (3)(A)(iii), (3)(C) and (3)(E)(i)–(ii) — the espionage and sabotage, unlawful-activity, overthrow, foreign-policy, and Nazi-persecution and genocide provisions.
What if I answered one of these wrongly on a form I already submitted?
A submitted DS-160 cannot be edited. What to do depends on the error and on your post's instructions — see fixing DS-160 mistakes. Because these particular questions carry the misrepresentation risk described above, this is a situation to take to a lawyer rather than to fix by quietly filing a new form.
Do these questions cover my social media accounts?
No. Social media identifiers are collected separately, in the address and phone section — see the DS-160 social media question.
Official sources
- 8 U.S.C. §1182 — inadmissible aliens, the statute these questions implement
- DS-160 on travel.state.gov
- Consular Electronic Application Center (CEAC)