DS-160 Portal Logo

Home / Executive Order 14419 "Ending Birth Tourism": What It Means for B-2 Applicants

Last reviewed:

Executive Order 14419 "Ending Birth Tourism": What It Means for B-2 Applicants

On 6 August 2026 the President signed Executive Order 14419, Ending Birth Tourism, published at 91 FR 51993. It is short — under 1,200 words — and most coverage has paraphrased it loosely. This page quotes it directly, because for a pregnant applicant the exact wording matters.

What the order defines as "birth tourism"

Section 3 gives a two-part definition:

(a) the entry of any foreign national into the United States via a nonimmigrant visa for the purpose of giving birth on American soil; or (b) any effort by any foreign national to facilitate the entry of any foreign national into the United States via a nonimmigrant visa for the purpose of giving birth on American soil.

The operative phrase is "for the purpose of giving birth". The order targets intent — travelling in order to give birth in the United States — not the fact of being pregnant while travelling.

What the order directs

Section 4 delegates authority to the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security and lists the actions they may take. Quoted in full, the list is:

appropriate action to prevent the entry into the United States of, or the granting of any visa or other travel authorization to, any alien entering or attempting to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in birth tourism; revoking the visa or travel authorization and permanently barring entry of any alien who enters or attempts to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in birth tourism; denial of entry to, or removal of, any alien who previously engaged or plans to engage in birth tourism; or other appropriate action against entities, organizations, or individuals, within or outside of the United States, responsible for facilitating or enabling birth tourism in any manner.

Four consequences, then, for someone found to be engaging in birth tourism:

  1. Visa denial at the consulate
  2. Visa revocation and a permanent bar on entry
  3. Denial of entry or removal at the border, including for previous birth tourism
  4. Action against facilitators — the agencies and "birth tourism operators" the order's preamble describes

The last point matters: the order reaches the businesses that arrange such travel, "within or outside of the United States".

The exemption

Section 5 preserves discretion:

the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security may exempt a foreign national from actions taken pursuant to this order on humanitarian grounds or when the foreign national's entry is in the national interest.

There is no automatic exemption for medical necessity, but humanitarian grounds are explicitly available at the Secretary's discretion.

What this is not

The order does not:

  • Ban pregnant women from travelling to the United States. Its definition turns on purpose, not pregnancy.
  • Change the DS-160 form. No new question was added by this order.
  • Change the law of birthright citizenship. The order's preamble discusses the Fourteenth Amendment's history, but its operative sections act only through visa and entry authority under INA §215(a).
  • Itself create the rules consular officers apply. It directs State and DHS to "update any rules, policies, operational guidance, or other guidance". The specific consular guidance implementing it is what officers will use — and that guidance, not the order, is what will describe how intent is assessed at interview.

What pregnant B-2 applicants should know

Consular officers assessed the purpose of visits to give birth before this order — 9 FAM already told officers that using a B-2 primarily to obtain U.S. citizenship for a child by birth was an impermissible purpose. The order raises the stakes: it adds permanent bar and revocation as tools, and it directs a coordinated policy rather than case-by-case discretion.

Practically:

  • State your true purpose on the DS-160. The form asks the purpose of your trip. If the purpose is medical care for the pregnancy or the birth, it is a medical B-2 purpose that requires showing a U.S. provider has agreed to treat you and that you can pay for it — see what B-2 covers. Presenting a birth-purpose trip as tourism is exactly the misrepresentation the order targets, and misrepresentation is a permanent ground of ineligibility under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(i) independent of this order.
  • Expect the question. A visibly pregnant applicant for a B-2 should expect the officer to ask about the purpose and timing of travel, and to assess it against the order.
  • Do not use an agency that markets U.S. births. The order names facilitators as targets. An application connected to such an operator is an application connected to the conduct the order exists to stop.

Frequently asked questions

Can a pregnant woman still get a B-2 visa?

Yes. The order targets travel for the purpose of giving birth. Pregnancy alone is not a ground of refusal. But an officer will assess purpose, and a trip timed to a due date invites that assessment.

Does the order change the DS-160?

No. The form is unchanged. What changes is how the stated purpose of the trip is scrutinised for pregnant applicants.

What happens if I am found to be engaging in birth tourism?

Under Section 4: denial of the visa; or revocation and a permanent bar; or denial of entry or removal, including for past birth tourism.

Is there any exemption?

Section 5 allows the Secretary of State or Homeland Security to exempt a person on humanitarian grounds or where entry is in the national interest. It is discretionary, not automatic.

Does this apply to ESTA / Visa Waiver travellers?

The order's definition refers to entry "via a nonimmigrant visa", but Section 4 covers "any visa or other travel authorization", which reaches ESTA. Assume it applies.

Does the order end birthright citizenship?

No. Its operative sections act only through visa and entry authority. It does not purport to change who is a citizen at birth.

Sources

Related guides